I came across this dated piece last week. I don’t know the original author, but thought it was good and wanted to share it.
Now it came to pass that a group existed who called themselves fishermen. And lo, there were many fish in the waters all around. In fact, the whole area was surrounded by streams and lakes filled with fish. And the fish were hungry.
Week after week, month after month, and year after year, these, who called themselves fishermen, met in meetings and talked about their call to fish and how they might go about fishing. Year after year they carefully defined what fishing means, defended fishing as an occupation, and declared that fishing is always to be the primary task of fishermen.
Continually they searched for new and better methods of fishing and for new and better definitions of fishing. Further, they said “the fishing industry exists by fishing as fire exists by burning.” They loved slogans, such as “Fishing is the Task of Every Fisherman,” and “Every Fisherman is a Fisher.” They spent considerable time discussing new fishing equipment, fish bait and places to fish. This was done in nice buildings called “Fishing Headquarters.” The one thing they didn’t do, however, was fish.
They taught numerous training classes on the needs of fish, the nature of fish, how to approach fish, and how to feed fish. Those who went through the training were given nice “fishing licenses” to hand on their walls, but they never fished. They did, however, laud the founding fathers who did great fishing in the past and praised them for handing down the tradition of fishing.
After one inspirational meeting on “The Necessity of Fishing,” one young man actually went fishing. The next day he reported that he had caught two outstanding fish. He was honored for his excellent catch and scheduled to visit all the big meetings possible to tell how he did it. He became so busy he quit fishing so he would have time to tell about his experience.
Or course, there were those of were critical of the fishermen and the fact that though they claimed to be fishermen, they never actually fished. They were very hurt when someone actually said that those who don’t go fishing are not actually fishermen, no matter how much they claimed to be. And yet, can one be considered a fisherman if year after year he or she never catches a fish?